Why speeches are bad

It's that time of the year again. It's that time of the year where we have to write a speech, plain old useless speech which we are never going to use again. HI my names and I'm going to talk to you about public speaking and how painful and pointless it is. The time it takes to write a speech is frustrating and annoying, you spend days writing your speech or if your one of those kids who can't be bothered writing a speech, because of how frustrating It Is.You spend one of your busy nights trying to find a decent speech to copy off the Internet, don't worry Mr./Mrs. – lilt copy this speech off the Internet, I can't say the same for the rest of the class though. Then there's the speaking side of your public speech, the part where you spend the night before printing cue cards, rehearsing It around the house, you then get to your big day you feel prepared you've rehearsed you have even brought your cue cards to school. Then there's your big moment and you forget everything you hav e rehearsed, you Just had last year's public speaking champion speak before you.The butterflies in your stomach are going mad. You start reading your speech, you start stuttering so much that you keep your head down and start reading off your cue cards which are really just your speech cut up into several pieces. You finish your speech and wait for your feedback and all you get is C. Teachers will argue with you that public speaking isn't pointless that it will help you in the future, that maybe so but is it worth spending 4 weeks of school. Two of which are school holidays. Is it worth it? My name is -? and this is why I think public speaking is pointless and painful.

The Rise of Youtube and the Causes of Internet Music piracy The WritePass Journal

The Rise of Youtube and the Causes of Internet Music piracy Bibliography The Rise of Youtube and the Causes of Internet Music piracy IntroductionBibliographyRelated Introduction Sharing of illegal musical contents is becoming very popular nowadays. Sharing tools and many websites such as Kazza and Pirates bay are considered as a major source for downloading musical tracks and albums from the Internet around the globe. There are many reasons which have caused these illegal acts to emerge. One of the possible causes is the high cost of some albums and concert tickets. Many musical concerts might ask for very high entry fee. Example of this is the ticket price of a local concert for an artist named Stevie Wonders at Yas Island which is set to a price of Dhs250! Some CD and DVD packages might be little overpriced as well; however, several websites such as Amazon offer used CD albums while other websites such as iTunes offer cheap Mp3 tracks and albums for as low as 1$ Â  ( 4Dhs). Another possible cause is the diversity of tools and methods used by the pirates to publish the stolen and illegal material. Tools such Ares, Shareeza, and Kazza could be downloaded easily into your computer and use the P2P technology to acquire all the latest albums. The P2P (peer to peer) technology allows thousands of persons to share the same album and even allow the illegal users to comment on and rate these contents. There are several search engines created to find the illegal peers (distributors) such as torrentz.com website which connects thousands of violating sites. There are also several website where you can search for recorded musical events too. Several sites exist like YouTube where people can upload and watch HD quality full concerts for free with subtitles which make it more convenient for them than paying for the ticket money. Some people might also use forums and blogs to distribute such albums. Twitter (which is a blogging site) is an excellent source for the leak ed mp3 tracks downloads. A third cause of this major issue is the lack of moral and legal knowledge about this issue. For instance, many of the teens nowadays think that it’s not bad to download songs from the Internet. A recent study made by Barna group discovered that only eight percent of the sample of 1448 teenagers thinks it’s morally wrong to download music illegally from the internet (Ventura, 2004). As a result, several laws are enforced to protect Artist’s rights such as the UAE Copyright Law .These laws range from huge fines to impressments of copy-right violators, but these laws are mostly implemented heavily on companies rather than particular persons and this might seem quite disappointing. As a conclusion, it’s hard to ignore the several causes that made some Internet users distribute copied music contents through the Internet. It will be better to educate these persons on the possible effects of their actions. Bibliography Moore, C. W. (2003, August 8). Is Music Piracy Stealing? Retrieved March 12, 2011, from Applelinks: applelinks.com/mooresviews/pirate.shtml Stevie Wonders. (n.d.). Retrieved 03 12, 2011, from Yas Island: yasisland.ae/en/events-calendar/flash-events/yas-island-show-weekends/concerts/stevie-wonder-live-on-yas-island/ Ventura. (2004, April 26). Fewer Than 1 in 10 Teenagers Believe that Music Piracy is Morally Wrong. Retrieved 03 12, 2011, from The Barna Group: barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/139-fewer-than-1-in-10-teenagers-believe-that-music-piracy-is-morally-wrong

Understanding Modern Evolutionary Synthesis

Understanding Modern Evolutionary Synthesis The theory of evolution has itself evolved quite a bit since the time when Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace first came up with the theory. Much more data has been discovered and collected over the years that have only helped to enhance and sharpen the idea that species change over time. The modern synthesis of the theory of evolution combines several different scientific disciplines and their overlapping findings. The original theory of evolution was based mostly upon the work of Naturalists. The modern synthesis has the benefit of many years of research in Genetics and Paleontology, among other various subjects under the biology umbrella. The actual modern synthesis is a collaboration of a large body of work from such celebrated scientists as J.B.S. Haldane, Ernst Mayr, and Theodosius Dobzhansky. While some current scientists assert that evo-devo is also a part of the modern synthesis, most agree it has so far played a very slight role in the overall synthesis. While most of Darwins ideas are still very much present in the modern evolutionary synthesis, there are some fundamental differences now that more data and new disciplines have been studied. This does not, in any way, take away from the importance of Darwins contribution and, in fact, it only helps support most of the ideas Darwin put forth in his book On the Origin of Species. Differences Between Original Theory of Evolution and Modern Evolutionary Synthesis The three main differences between the original Theory of Evolution through Natural Selection proposed by Charles Darwin and the most current Modern Evolutionary Synthesis are as follows: The modern synthesis recognizes several different possible mechanisms of evolution. Darwins theory relied on natural selection as the only known mechanism. One of these different mechanisms, genetic drift, could even match the importance of natural selection in the overall view of evolution.Modern synthesis asserts that characteristics are passed down from parents to offspring on parts of DNA called genes. Variation between individuals within a species is because of the presence of multiple alleles of a gene.The modern synthesis of the Theory of Evolution hypothesizes that speciation is most likely due to the gradual accumulation of small changes or mutations at the gene level. In other words, microevolution leads to macroevolution. Thanks to years of dedicated research by scientists across many disciplines, we now have a much better understanding of how evolution works and a more accurate picture of the change species undergo over a period of time. Even though different facets of evolutionary theory have changed, the fundamental ideas are still intact and just as relevant today as they were in the 1800s.

Team Assignment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Team Assignment - Essay Example It advocates for doing the right thing regardless of whether it is causing any harm. In regards to the theories the leading advocates include; Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) who started the utilitarianism. He stated that the morally upright thing to do is that of not harming other people and bringing about happiness. Other Classical Utilitarianism starters include Richard Cumberland (1631-1718), John Gay (1699-1745). On the other hand Kantianism theory was introduced by Immanuel Kant (Melden, 2008). Cultural relativism is defined as a standard initiated by Franz Boaz which indicates that people’s ideas and opinions are factual in accordance to the civilization they are in. Cultural relativism shows that customs, beliefs as well as ethics that are related to a person in the society he is in. simply put is that wrong and right are classified in terms of a person’s culture (Melden, 2008). It shows that no culture is better than the other. In regards to individual relativism this means that a person’s beliefs and opinions are strictly what they believe to be true. Individual relativists usually take what he believes in extremely seriously. Looking at the comparison to the ethical relativism to the traditional theories is easy to see that there are some distinctive differences and some similarities. By definition ethical relativism means that there is a tendency of people making decisions that are ethical based on what they see fit in accordance to their beliefs. Traditional approaches can be classified into two; consequentialism and non-consequentialism (Melden, 2008). Consequentialism means that actions that are right or wrong depend on the consequences; on the other hand non-consequentialism dictates that a wrong or right action does not depend on the consequences. In light of this ethical relativism contradicts with the traditional theories in that the beliefs are not based on the culture one comes

E-Business Final Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

E-Business Final - Essay Example The layout or web design of any website plays an important role in the success of e-business. Websites should be user-friendly, well designed, attractive, easy to navigate and search-engine friendly. Qatar Airways have considered all these features in their website. Business to business transactions helps in building new and strong relationships with other companies worldwide. They are reducing the costs and providing best services with the help of their Oracle ERP project and partnership with other airlines, hotels, travel agents and car rental services. For Qatar Airways ethical issues are very important. It is part of their ethics to take care of confidentiality and security issues of customers and to provide the information that does not hurt the emotions of their global customers. Qatar Airways, an airline company, was established on November 22, 1993 and it formally started its operations from January 20, 1994. It is one of the most competitive and fastest growing airlines in the world. In the span of thirteen years, QA has achieved tremendous growth by serving 100 destinations worldwide (Middle East Aviation, n.d.). Due to the advancement in Information and communication technologies, companies are now using latest technologies to remain competitive (Beheshti & Sangari, 2006). Click and mortar model is employed by the Qatar Airways. According to this model company sells through internet as well as through the traditional ways of selling. Qatar airlines have commenced an extensive Oracle ERP system to link or centralize different departments. Although, it is a costly plan but it will help in increasing the efficiency in the long run. Qatar Airways is reducing its expenses by providing many online services. These include Online Booking, Online Time Table, Online Route Map, Flight Status Information, Information via SMS, Online check-in, SMS check-in, Phone check-in,

Visions for ethical, caring nursing care Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Visions for ethical, caring nursing care - Essay Example ces( Nursing Administration Quarterly Jan-Mar; 3-(1): 48-55) discusses the relationship that exists between economics, caring and administrative practices, and what is missing in this currently. The author asserts that a professional ethos is required so that health institutions are well managed. Therefore, health practice should be ethics based. The aforementioned articles illustrate similar concepts that are well illustrated by various ethical theories; utilitarianism, deontology and virtue theory. The utilitarianism theory requires that we are able to know consequences of our actions before performing these actions. Therefore, when performing tasks, it is important to go for those that are ethically correct. This theory when injected into health practice will ensure that only those actions that are ethically correct are done by nurses and other health care practitioners (Melden 2008, p12). The Deontological theory asserts that people are required to perform their duties and obligations when faced with ethical dilemmas. This theory when applied in nursing practice ensures that health care experts will always perform their obligations for the benefit of customers. The virtue theory is different from the other theories in that there is no emphasis on ethical rules, but instead the emphasis is on teaching people virtues like kindness, generosity and courtesy. Therefore, this theory ensures that health care mangers teach their employees virtues that would improve nursing practice (Melden 2008,

Variable of Organization Culture and Characteristics

Variable of Organization Culture and Characteristics Purpose Literature has studied the variables of organization culture and managerial characteristics separately in various dimensions. This study investigates the effects of organizational culture and managerial characteristic on the tradeoff between organizational sincerity and work performance for promotion. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected using self-administered questionnaire, from managers of different departments. The final sample size was 250 managers. Findings The result showed that there is a positive relation between organizational culture, work performance, and organizational sincerity. A positive association also exists between managers education level and work performance given that the gender is male. Research limitations/implications Few limitations would be the shortage of time and resources. In future studies other managerial characteristics should also be examined. Practical implications In this era of immense competition, companies may ask themselves what to criteria to choose while promoting employees. Result shows that there is a positive relation between organizations culture, work performance, and organizational sincerity. Originality/value The most interesting and significant finding is that there is a positive relation between organizational culture, work performance, and organizational sincerity. Accordingly the stronger the culture of the organization the better work performers and sincere employees it has. Keywords Organizational culture, Managerial characteristics, Work Performance, Sincerity CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Overview It has been argued that loyal and sincere employees are very important for success of organizations (Jaunch, Glueck, Osborn, 1978). It is said that coherent and carefully developed corporate values play an important role, in making employees, loyal to organizations (Smith Rupp, 2002). Work performance has been studied in different dimensions. Earlier the study of work performance was limited only to job satisfaction (Martin Shore, 1978). Ovadje, Obinna and Muogboh (2009) also studied the relation between job satisfaction and individual performance, according to their study the relationship between the two was high and consistent. Jaunch, Glueck and Osborn (1978) have argued that loyalty has no relationship with work efficiency. They used five point scales to measure organizational sincerity, commitment and productivity. Avolio, Waldman, and McDaniel (1990) studied the effect of age and experience on work performance and concluded that experience is a better predictor of performance than age. It is argued that health of organizations depends upon health of employees, if employees are healthy they will perform better and organizations will grow (Baptiste, 2008). Paswan,Pelton and True (2005) studied perception of managerial sincerity in context of motivation and job satisfaction, they concluded that loyalty of employees is very important in getting good feedback as they are employees are more interactive and motivated. The relationship between employees and organization depends upon how they perceive the organization (Martin Shore, 1989). Baffour (1999) also argues that organizations in which employees are part of decision making perform better than those with centralized decision making. Employees loyalty may lead to employees satisfaction and productivity or it may result in dissatisfaction and absenteeism (Becker, Billings, Eveleth Gilbert, 1996). Previously supervisory ratings and questionnaire have been used to measure organizational sincerity and work performance respectively (Jaunch et al, 1978). It is argued that participative management makes employees satisfied (Kim, 2002). Therefore loyalty and sincerity of employees to organization is considered as an important factor in promotions (Jaunch et al, 1978). It is also said that quality has relationship with satisfaction (Ilias, Rahman Razak, 2008). Barney (1986) argued that that firms which do not have the required cultures cannot sustain optimal financial performance because their respective cultures are neither rare nor difficult to imitate. Weick (1987) also argued that organizations whose cultures value reliability more than efficiency often face unique problems in learning and understanding, which could affect the performance of the organization. It is argued that top management involvement is very essential to handle strategic change efficiently and effectively (Boecker, 1997). Gupta and Govindarajan (1984) also argued that tolerance of mangers contribute positively make business unit more efficient Although work performance is studied by different researchers in different dimensions, but no one has tried to link organizational sincerity to work performance. This study aims to identify the interrelation of work performance and organizational sincerity. Today in the world of immense competition both traits of sincerity and hard working in an employee is hard to find. Through this study we want to find whether a manager will prefer an employee who is hard worker or an employee who is sincere towards his organization. Problem Statement To study the effects of managerial characteristics and organizational culture on managers trade-off between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee promotion. Proposed Research Hypotheses H1: There is a relationship between managerial characteristics and promotion criterion due to organizational sincerity. H2: There is a relationship between managerial characteristics and promotion criterion due to work performance. H3: There is a relationship between organizational culture and promotion criterion due to organizational sincerity. H4 : There is a relationship between organizational culture and promotion criterion due to work performance. H5: There is a relationship between managers education and work performance due to male gender. H6: There is a relationship between managers education and work performance due to female gender. Outline of the Study Chapter one includes the an overview of variables, problem statement that shows the possible relationship between managerial characteristics, work performance and impact of both on promotion criterion and six proposed research hypotheses with a brief outline of the study. Chapter two includes the literature review. In this chapter organizational culture, organizational sincerity and work performance are explained. Chapter three is comprised of method of data collection which is personal survey, sampling technique which is non-probability convenient sampling ,size which is two hundred and fifty, instrument of data collection, research model developed which supports the problem statement and statistical technique which is correlation. Chapter four includes the results which show the relationships between variables. Lastly Chapter five includes conclusion, discussions, implications and possible future researches. CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW The labor markets are becoming competitive day by day and it is very rare to find an employee that performs efficiently and whose goals are compatible with those of organizations. Therefore, most of times managers have to choose between a loyal employee and an efficient employee. Several factors influence this phenomenon. Culture It has been argued that there are considerable differences in the attitudes of managers as well as employees in the geographically and historically similar countries. These differences have been found across such variables as control, supervision, commitment, and decision type and leadership style. It was further revealed that these differences in the attitudes of managers and employees was associated with their respective countrys position on the Hofstedes cultural dimensions.(Mockaitis, 2005). Glinow, Huo and Lowe argued that despite numerous researches conducted on International Management styles, the studies have still failed to illustrate how ideal leadership or management style is affected by the specific cultural characteristics in different countries. They argued that although multinational firms should maintain some form of consistency in terms of management style, yet the management style used overseas (in different cultures) should be enfused with the local culture to maintain acceptability within the cultural context. Ralston, Holt, Terpstra and Cheng argued that economic ideology and national culture has a deep impact on individual work values of managers. Barney argues that organizational culture can be a source of sustained competitive advantage. He argued that some organizations have developed a culture which provides means to achieve competitive advantage. Schein argued that organizational culture has profound effects on its survival. He stated that an organization cannot survive if it cannot manage itself as an organized one through the use of deeply entrenched culture. He further argued that organizational culture brings in stability and thus it must be instilled into the new members. Schein argued in another paper that culture needs to be understood thoroughly and analyzed if an organization intends to take advantage of it in the field of organizational psychology. Denison and Mishra argued that there was a relationship between organizational culture and effectiveness. According to them organizational culture can be measured and can be related to critical organizational outcomes. Chatman and Jehn argued that the use of organizational culture to attain competitive advantage may not bear as much fruit as some scholars have argued it to be. They argued that there may be some constraints in the way to achieving this competitive advantage by using organizational culture. According to Sheridan (1992), organizational culture and employee retention are related. His study showed that the differences in employees cultural values and the organizational values resulted in significant cases where employees deliberately left their jobs indicating that cultural fit is imperative to job retention for the organizations. Gordan DiTomaso (1992) argued that a strong organizational culture is positively associated with better performance. Their research also concluded that a strong culture lends itself to a short-term performance hike. Organizational Sincerity Loyalty is directly related to corporate vision, mission and values. As the business world is multifaceted therefore approach should be chosen with great care to analyse the gap between promise and performance gap (Fassin Buelens, 2011). Managers role in encouraging employees, giving them feedback regarding their performance and guiding leading them towards right career is very important. When employees are motivated because of management support they deliver quality sevice. Except of that employees whose goals are compatible with those of organizations are more productive and enthusiastic (Paswan, Pelton and True). Ali and Kazemi (1993) argue that loyal employee are real assets of an organization because they are those who do not quit in rainy days and stand by the organization as they own the problems of organization. Furthermore they say that sincere employees are more productive and are punctual. In case of loyalty, in US skills are preferred on seniority and seniority is not as important promotion criterion as skills are. While in Japan seniority is most important to be qualified as leader. But in Taiwan connections with owners are also valued along with seniority as important criteria to be qualified as leader (Glinow,Huo Lowe,1999). In US mangers are considered more competent than employees therefore speaking skills are important criteria to be promoted as leader and leaders tend to be good speakers to communicate corporate vision. While Japanese believe in equality and homogeneity of human talent therefore subordinates input is considered very important. Taiwan is hybrid of both (Glinow et al, 1999). In US a leader needs to develop specialized skills to be promoted as leader while in Japan to be a leader one needs to possess broad-cope skills and experience. In Taiwan both, specialized skills and broad-scope skills with experience are important criteria to be an effective leader (Glinow et al, 1999). Chen and Tjosvold (2006) have argued that to strengthen the relationship between employees must tbe cooperative and not the competitive especially when mangers are from different countries. Work Performance There is a noteworthy impact of HRM practices that a company adopts on the wellbeing and positive performance of employees (Baptiste, 2007). Performance can be improved by employee participation and flexibility in job design. (Gershenfeld, 1988; Jaikumar, 1986). Managers should encourage employee participation and flexible structures to enhance the performance. Firms that are changing their traditional rigid organizational structure and bringing flexibility in work design are able to improve their performance and output quality (Baffour, 1999). Age and experience have non linear relationship with performance. Experience, rather than age, is a better predictor of performance ( Avolio, Waldman McDaniel, 1990) Blumberg and Pringle (1982) emphasized a model of work performance which says that performance is a result of ability motivation and opportunity. It is argued that health of organizations is directly influenced by health of employees, if employees are healthy they will perform better and organizations will grow and become healthy (Baptiste, 2008). Gillespie and Mann (2004) and Dirks and Ferrin (2002) have argued that trust is an important feature in the relationship that leaders have with their subordinates and that it is through this subordinate trust and respect for their leader, that subordinates are motivated to perform well. This view is supported by Bijlsma and Koopma (2003) who claim that trust is an important factor to organizational performance, because it facilitates discretionary effort to assist the organization. Standing (1997) argues that the critical areas of labor insecurity that should be considered as they effect work performance are those that relate to income insecurity (unsteady earnings or where earnings are contingency-based), working time insecurity (irregular hours at the discretion of the employer, and insufficient hours worked) and representation insecurity (where the employee has limited power to negotiate or participate). Design and physical properties of work place can have negative or positive effect on work performance of employees. A greater environment innovative work settings, a greater task performance in innovative work settings and a greater interaction with innovative work settings are associated with greater satisfaction and enhanced productivity (Ilozer, 2002) According to Armstrong (2000), performance management is a way of getting better results from the whole organization or individuals within it, by understanding and managing performance within an agreed framework of predetermined goals, standards and competence requirements. According to Walters (1995), performance management is about guiding and supporting employees to work as effectively and efficiently as possible according to the goals of the organization. A drug-free workplace helps to enhance output and performance and lowers the chance of injury. Many companies feel testing employees has helped to bring about lower costs, lower absenteeism, and lower medical costs (Bacon, 1989). CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS Method of Data Collection As our research study is descriptive and sources of information are primary, therefore we have used personal type of survey to collect the data. First of all data collection process was planned properly and then instrument was developed accordingly. After the development of instrument, pilot testing was done. Lastly actual data was collected and compiled. To collect the data through questionnaire we approached managers of different organization and used snow ball technique. Sampling Technique As the number of elements is unknown, we have used Non-probability sampling technique. To collect data in proper and convenient way, Convience sampling is used. The managers are easily accessible so it is most beneficial of all other sampling techniques. First of all the population was defined, and then sampling frame was determined. After determination of sampling frame, sampling technique was decided. Once the technique is decided, sample size was decided too. At last, the sampling process was executed. Sample Size The proposed number of respondents is two hundred and fifty (250). Instrument of Data Collection To study the effects of managerial characteristics and organizational culture on managers trade-off between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee production, a questionnaire is developed comprising of nine questions. First question is about the work practices of mangers and their individualistic approach towards the work and how they perceive and conceive it. This question is further divided in ten questions in order to become more specific. Second question, which is further subdivided into twenty questions, is about the organizational culture. The number of questions is higher as compare to previous one because culture is more descriptive and a lot of information is required to comprehend it. Third question is about gender. It will tell us that whether gender makes any difference in giving promotion either to an efficient or loyal employee. Question four is about the age. It will also help us to see whether attitudes and beliefs regarding loyalty and efficiency change with respect to age. Fifth and sixth questions are about employee experience with current organization and overall experience respectively. The seventh and eighth questions education and functional department is asked from respondents. It will enable us to comment whether perception of employee importance as education level and department change. Ninth and last question regarding name is optional because we are studying role of managers in promoting efficient or loyal employees impartially and irrespective of name, caste or color. In short the questionnaire was designed to collect about employees work practices, the culture of organization they work in and the managerial characteristics. Validity and Reliability test. The instrument used here is valid and reliable. Because it is specifically designed to collect data specifically required to study the effects of managerial characteristics and organizational culture on managers trade-off between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee promotion. To check the validity and reliability of instrument we did pilot testing and found the instrument valid and reliable in accordance with our study. Therefore data collected through this instrument is also valid and reliable and leads us to more useful and specific results. Research Model Developed Figure 3.1 Managerial Characteristic Organizational Sincerity Work Performance Organizational Culture Organizational management has to deal with different types of employees. Some are very hardworking and efficient while others are very loyal to the organizations. It is of great importance to an organization to understand the relationship between the organizational sincerity and work in order to grow, compete and even survive. Statistical Technique Correlation will be used for data analysis. We have used correlation because it is the statistical technique which enables us to understand and interpret the interdependence between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee performance. CHAPTER 4: RESULTS Table 4.1 Promotion criteria Managerial characteristics Organizational culture Organizational Sincerity Work Performance Age (Male) .055 (.404) -0.13 (.837) Age (Female) .226 (.418) -.170 (.546) Working Experience With Current Organization (Male) .058 (.376) .077 (.238) Working Experience With Current Organization (Female) .262 (.346) -.025 (.930) Overall Working Experience (Male) -0.19 (.768) .049 (.455) Overall Working Experience (Female) .269 (.333) -.239 (.390) Education Level (Male) -0.25 (.706) .117* (.073) Education Level (Female) .107 (.704) .314 (.254) Organizational Culture .395** (.000) .299** (.000) *, Correlation is significant at the 0.10 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). P value is written in parenthesis. All the Managerial characteristics except for Education Level of Male are insignificant as their P value > ÃŽÂ ±. A positive relation is shown between organizational culture, organizational sincerity, and work performance having P-value CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION, DISCUSSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH Conclusion Data analysis shows that there is no relation between managerial characteristics and organizational sincerity for both the genders, male and female. But in case of managerial characteristics and work performance, a relationship is established between managers education level and work performance but only for male gender. For female gender no such relationship exists. Analysis also shows that organizational culture is positively related to organizational sincerity and work performance. That suggest that stronger the organizational culture, better the wok performance and sincerity. Discussions, Implications and Future Research Organizational culture, sincerity and work performance are very important and crucial towards the achievement of organizational goals. Therefore work performance has been studied in relation to job satisfaction and consistent relations are established. But few attempts are made to find out the impact of organizational culture on achievement of organizational goals which is dependent upon work performance which leads to greater output and organizational sincerity. As we have found out a positive relationship between organizational culture and sincerity and between that of organizational culture and work performance. We can say that organizations in order to improve performance and build stronger relationship with their employees should work on building stronger and compatible organizational culture. It will not only improve employees productivity but employee turnover will also reduce which will save the training costs et cetera ultimately. Except of that competencies and skills which are developed in employees over a period of time can also be retained and even competitive advantage can be achieved on basis of it. Even though we have studied very important relationships among managerial characteristics, organizational culture, organizational sincerity and work performance, a lot needs to be done in this newly identified direction. In this unexplored direction and field of study researchers can study many variables like impact of organizational culture on conflict of interest and can enhance the understanding further. References Ali J Abbas and Kazemi Al- Ali (2005), The Kuwaiti Manager: Work Values and Orientations Journal of Business Ethics , 60: 63-73 DOI 10.1007A10551-005-2626-6 Armstrong, M. (2000), Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidances, Kogan Page, London. Avolio J. Bruce, Waldman A. David and McDaniel A. Michael (1990),Age and work performance in non-managerial jobs the effects of experience and occupational type, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No 2, 407-422. Bacon, D. (1989), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Businesss Role in War on Drugs, Nations Business, January, p.5. Baffour Gyan- George, (1999) The effects of employee participation and work design on firm performance: A managerial perspective, Management Research News, Vol. 22 Iss: 6, pp.1- 12 Baptiste Renee Nicole, (2008),Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and performance: a new dimension for HRM Volume: 46 Number: 2 pp: 284-309 Barney B. Jay (1986) , à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?,The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 3 , pp. 656-665 Becker E. Thomas, Billings S. Robert, Eveleth M. Daniel and Gilbert L. Nicole (1996),Foci and bases of employees commitment: implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No 2,464-482. Bijlsma, K. and Koopma, K. (2003), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Introduction: trust within organizations, Personnel Review, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 600-4. Blumberg, M., Pringle, C. C. (1982), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for the theory of work performance. Academy Of Management Review,7: 560-569. Boeker Warren (1997), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The Influence of Managerial Characteristics and Organizational Growth, the Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 152-170. Chatman A. Jennifer Jehn A. Karen (1994). Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: how different can you be?. Academy of management Journal 1995. Vol. 37, No. 3, 522-553 Chen Feng Yi and Tjosvold Dean, Participative Leadership by American and Chinese Managers in China: The Role of Relationships,Journal of Management Studies 43:8 December 2006 0022-2380 Denison r. Daniel Mishra K. Aneil (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization science. Vol. 6, No. 2, March-April 1995. Dirks, K. and Ferrin, D. (2002), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87 No. 4, pp. 611-28. Fassin Yves and Buelens Mark, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The hypocrisy-sincerity continuum in corporate communication and decision-making: a model of corporate social responsibility and business ethics practices, Ghent University, Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000 Gent And Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Reep 1, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Gershenfeld Cutcher(1988), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Industrial Relations and Economic Performance, Working Paper, School of Labor and Indus trial Relations, Michigan State University.. Gillespie, N. and Mann, L. (2004), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust, Journal of Managerial Psychology,Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 588-607. Glinow Ann Von Mary, Huo Paul Y., Lowe Kevin (1999),Leadership across the Pacific Ocean: a tri-national comparison,International Business Review, 8(1), 1-15. Gordan G. George DiTomaso (1992), Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture, Journal of Management Studies. Volume 29, Issue 6, pages 783-798. Gupta K. Anil and Govindarajan .V (1984), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1,pp. 25-41. Ilias Azleen, Rahman Abd Rahida, Abd Razak Zulkeflee Mohd (2008) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions, International business research, Vol. 1, No 3. Ilozer Dozie Ben, Love E.D Peter. Treloar Graham (2002), The Impact of Work Settings On Organizational Performance measures in built FacilitiesVolume 20, pp 61-68. Jaikumar, R, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Post industrial manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 64(6). 1986; pp.69-76. Jaunch R Lawrence, Glueck F William and Osborn N Richard (1978),Organizational loyalty, professional commitment, and academic research productivity, Academy of management Journal ,Vol. 2,No 1,84-92 Kim Soonhe (2002), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Participative management and job satisfaction: lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review. Martin J. Harry and Shore McFarlane Lynn (1989),Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in relation to work performance and turnover intentions. Human Relations, Volume 42 pp. 625-658 Mockaitis I. Audra (2005). A Cross-Cultural Study of Leadership Attitudes in Three Baltic Sea Region Countries. International Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol. 1 Iss. 1, 2005, pp. 44-63 Ovadje Franca Muogboh S. Obinna, (2009),Exploring the motivation to stay and to perform among managers in Nigeria, International Journal of Business Research. Paswan K. Audhesh, Pelton E. Lou and True L. Sheb (2005),Perceived managerial sincerity, feedback-seeking orientation and motivation among front-line employees of a service organization, Journal of Services Marketing Volume 19  · Number 1, 3-12. Ralston A. David, Holt H. David, Robert H. Terpstra and Cheng Kai Yu (2007). The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: a study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-19 Schein Edger H (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Slogan management Review. Vol 25, Issue: 2, Publisher: Samfundslitteratur, Pages: 3-16 Schein, Edgar H (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, Vol 45(2), Feb 1990, 109-119. Sheridan E. John (1992). Organizational culture and employee retention. Academy of management journal 1992. Vol. 35, No. 5, 1036-1056. Smith D. Alan and Rupp T. William (2002),Communication and loyalty among knowledge workers: a resource of the firm theory view, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 6,No. 3,pp250-261. Standing, G. (1997), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Globalisation, labour flexibility and insecurity: the era of market regulation, European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 3, pp. 7-37. Walters, M. (1995), Performance Management Handbook, Institute of Personnel and Development, London. Weick KE (1987), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Organizational culture as a source of high-reliability, The California Management Review , volume 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 112-127. Variable of Organization Culture and Characteristics Variable of Organization Culture and Characteristics Purpose Literature has studied the variables of organization culture and managerial characteristics separately in various dimensions. This study investigates the effects of organizational culture and managerial characteristic on the tradeoff between organizational sincerity and work performance for promotion. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected using self-administered questionnaire, from managers of different departments. The final sample size was 250 managers. Findings The result showed that there is a positive relation between organizational culture, work performance, and organizational sincerity. A positive association also exists between managers education level and work performance given that the gender is male. Research limitations/implications Few limitations would be the shortage of time and resources. In future studies other managerial characteristics should also be examined. Practical implications In this era of immense competition, companies may ask themselves what to criteria to choose while promoting employees. Result shows that there is a positive relation between organizations culture, work performance, and organizational sincerity. Originality/value The most interesting and significant finding is that there is a positive relation between organizational culture, work performance, and organizational sincerity. Accordingly the stronger the culture of the organization the better work performers and sincere employees it has. Keywords Organizational culture, Managerial characteristics, Work Performance, Sincerity CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Overview It has been argued that loyal and sincere employees are very important for success of organizations (Jaunch, Glueck, Osborn, 1978). It is said that coherent and carefully developed corporate values play an important role, in making employees, loyal to organizations (Smith Rupp, 2002). Work performance has been studied in different dimensions. Earlier the study of work performance was limited only to job satisfaction (Martin Shore, 1978). Ovadje, Obinna and Muogboh (2009) also studied the relation between job satisfaction and individual performance, according to their study the relationship between the two was high and consistent. Jaunch, Glueck and Osborn (1978) have argued that loyalty has no relationship with work efficiency. They used five point scales to measure organizational sincerity, commitment and productivity. Avolio, Waldman, and McDaniel (1990) studied the effect of age and experience on work performance and concluded that experience is a better predictor of performance than age. It is argued that health of organizations depends upon health of employees, if employees are healthy they will perform better and organizations will grow (Baptiste, 2008). Paswan,Pelton and True (2005) studied perception of managerial sincerity in context of motivation and job satisfaction, they concluded that loyalty of employees is very important in getting good feedback as they are employees are more interactive and motivated. The relationship between employees and organization depends upon how they perceive the organization (Martin Shore, 1989). Baffour (1999) also argues that organizations in which employees are part of decision making perform better than those with centralized decision making. Employees loyalty may lead to employees satisfaction and productivity or it may result in dissatisfaction and absenteeism (Becker, Billings, Eveleth Gilbert, 1996). Previously supervisory ratings and questionnaire have been used to measure organizational sincerity and work performance respectively (Jaunch et al, 1978). It is argued that participative management makes employees satisfied (Kim, 2002). Therefore loyalty and sincerity of employees to organization is considered as an important factor in promotions (Jaunch et al, 1978). It is also said that quality has relationship with satisfaction (Ilias, Rahman Razak, 2008). Barney (1986) argued that that firms which do not have the required cultures cannot sustain optimal financial performance because their respective cultures are neither rare nor difficult to imitate. Weick (1987) also argued that organizations whose cultures value reliability more than efficiency often face unique problems in learning and understanding, which could affect the performance of the organization. It is argued that top management involvement is very essential to handle strategic change efficiently and effectively (Boecker, 1997). Gupta and Govindarajan (1984) also argued that tolerance of mangers contribute positively make business unit more efficient Although work performance is studied by different researchers in different dimensions, but no one has tried to link organizational sincerity to work performance. This study aims to identify the interrelation of work performance and organizational sincerity. Today in the world of immense competition both traits of sincerity and hard working in an employee is hard to find. Through this study we want to find whether a manager will prefer an employee who is hard worker or an employee who is sincere towards his organization. Problem Statement To study the effects of managerial characteristics and organizational culture on managers trade-off between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee promotion. Proposed Research Hypotheses H1: There is a relationship between managerial characteristics and promotion criterion due to organizational sincerity. H2: There is a relationship between managerial characteristics and promotion criterion due to work performance. H3: There is a relationship between organizational culture and promotion criterion due to organizational sincerity. H4 : There is a relationship between organizational culture and promotion criterion due to work performance. H5: There is a relationship between managers education and work performance due to male gender. H6: There is a relationship between managers education and work performance due to female gender. Outline of the Study Chapter one includes the an overview of variables, problem statement that shows the possible relationship between managerial characteristics, work performance and impact of both on promotion criterion and six proposed research hypotheses with a brief outline of the study. Chapter two includes the literature review. In this chapter organizational culture, organizational sincerity and work performance are explained. Chapter three is comprised of method of data collection which is personal survey, sampling technique which is non-probability convenient sampling ,size which is two hundred and fifty, instrument of data collection, research model developed which supports the problem statement and statistical technique which is correlation. Chapter four includes the results which show the relationships between variables. Lastly Chapter five includes conclusion, discussions, implications and possible future researches. CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW The labor markets are becoming competitive day by day and it is very rare to find an employee that performs efficiently and whose goals are compatible with those of organizations. Therefore, most of times managers have to choose between a loyal employee and an efficient employee. Several factors influence this phenomenon. Culture It has been argued that there are considerable differences in the attitudes of managers as well as employees in the geographically and historically similar countries. These differences have been found across such variables as control, supervision, commitment, and decision type and leadership style. It was further revealed that these differences in the attitudes of managers and employees was associated with their respective countrys position on the Hofstedes cultural dimensions.(Mockaitis, 2005). Glinow, Huo and Lowe argued that despite numerous researches conducted on International Management styles, the studies have still failed to illustrate how ideal leadership or management style is affected by the specific cultural characteristics in different countries. They argued that although multinational firms should maintain some form of consistency in terms of management style, yet the management style used overseas (in different cultures) should be enfused with the local culture to maintain acceptability within the cultural context. Ralston, Holt, Terpstra and Cheng argued that economic ideology and national culture has a deep impact on individual work values of managers. Barney argues that organizational culture can be a source of sustained competitive advantage. He argued that some organizations have developed a culture which provides means to achieve competitive advantage. Schein argued that organizational culture has profound effects on its survival. He stated that an organization cannot survive if it cannot manage itself as an organized one through the use of deeply entrenched culture. He further argued that organizational culture brings in stability and thus it must be instilled into the new members. Schein argued in another paper that culture needs to be understood thoroughly and analyzed if an organization intends to take advantage of it in the field of organizational psychology. Denison and Mishra argued that there was a relationship between organizational culture and effectiveness. According to them organizational culture can be measured and can be related to critical organizational outcomes. Chatman and Jehn argued that the use of organizational culture to attain competitive advantage may not bear as much fruit as some scholars have argued it to be. They argued that there may be some constraints in the way to achieving this competitive advantage by using organizational culture. According to Sheridan (1992), organizational culture and employee retention are related. His study showed that the differences in employees cultural values and the organizational values resulted in significant cases where employees deliberately left their jobs indicating that cultural fit is imperative to job retention for the organizations. Gordan DiTomaso (1992) argued that a strong organizational culture is positively associated with better performance. Their research also concluded that a strong culture lends itself to a short-term performance hike. Organizational Sincerity Loyalty is directly related to corporate vision, mission and values. As the business world is multifaceted therefore approach should be chosen with great care to analyse the gap between promise and performance gap (Fassin Buelens, 2011). Managers role in encouraging employees, giving them feedback regarding their performance and guiding leading them towards right career is very important. When employees are motivated because of management support they deliver quality sevice. Except of that employees whose goals are compatible with those of organizations are more productive and enthusiastic (Paswan, Pelton and True). Ali and Kazemi (1993) argue that loyal employee are real assets of an organization because they are those who do not quit in rainy days and stand by the organization as they own the problems of organization. Furthermore they say that sincere employees are more productive and are punctual. In case of loyalty, in US skills are preferred on seniority and seniority is not as important promotion criterion as skills are. While in Japan seniority is most important to be qualified as leader. But in Taiwan connections with owners are also valued along with seniority as important criteria to be qualified as leader (Glinow,Huo Lowe,1999). In US mangers are considered more competent than employees therefore speaking skills are important criteria to be promoted as leader and leaders tend to be good speakers to communicate corporate vision. While Japanese believe in equality and homogeneity of human talent therefore subordinates input is considered very important. Taiwan is hybrid of both (Glinow et al, 1999). In US a leader needs to develop specialized skills to be promoted as leader while in Japan to be a leader one needs to possess broad-cope skills and experience. In Taiwan both, specialized skills and broad-scope skills with experience are important criteria to be an effective leader (Glinow et al, 1999). Chen and Tjosvold (2006) have argued that to strengthen the relationship between employees must tbe cooperative and not the competitive especially when mangers are from different countries. Work Performance There is a noteworthy impact of HRM practices that a company adopts on the wellbeing and positive performance of employees (Baptiste, 2007). Performance can be improved by employee participation and flexibility in job design. (Gershenfeld, 1988; Jaikumar, 1986). Managers should encourage employee participation and flexible structures to enhance the performance. Firms that are changing their traditional rigid organizational structure and bringing flexibility in work design are able to improve their performance and output quality (Baffour, 1999). Age and experience have non linear relationship with performance. Experience, rather than age, is a better predictor of performance ( Avolio, Waldman McDaniel, 1990) Blumberg and Pringle (1982) emphasized a model of work performance which says that performance is a result of ability motivation and opportunity. It is argued that health of organizations is directly influenced by health of employees, if employees are healthy they will perform better and organizations will grow and become healthy (Baptiste, 2008). Gillespie and Mann (2004) and Dirks and Ferrin (2002) have argued that trust is an important feature in the relationship that leaders have with their subordinates and that it is through this subordinate trust and respect for their leader, that subordinates are motivated to perform well. This view is supported by Bijlsma and Koopma (2003) who claim that trust is an important factor to organizational performance, because it facilitates discretionary effort to assist the organization. Standing (1997) argues that the critical areas of labor insecurity that should be considered as they effect work performance are those that relate to income insecurity (unsteady earnings or where earnings are contingency-based), working time insecurity (irregular hours at the discretion of the employer, and insufficient hours worked) and representation insecurity (where the employee has limited power to negotiate or participate). Design and physical properties of work place can have negative or positive effect on work performance of employees. A greater environment innovative work settings, a greater task performance in innovative work settings and a greater interaction with innovative work settings are associated with greater satisfaction and enhanced productivity (Ilozer, 2002) According to Armstrong (2000), performance management is a way of getting better results from the whole organization or individuals within it, by understanding and managing performance within an agreed framework of predetermined goals, standards and competence requirements. According to Walters (1995), performance management is about guiding and supporting employees to work as effectively and efficiently as possible according to the goals of the organization. A drug-free workplace helps to enhance output and performance and lowers the chance of injury. Many companies feel testing employees has helped to bring about lower costs, lower absenteeism, and lower medical costs (Bacon, 1989). CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS Method of Data Collection As our research study is descriptive and sources of information are primary, therefore we have used personal type of survey to collect the data. First of all data collection process was planned properly and then instrument was developed accordingly. After the development of instrument, pilot testing was done. Lastly actual data was collected and compiled. To collect the data through questionnaire we approached managers of different organization and used snow ball technique. Sampling Technique As the number of elements is unknown, we have used Non-probability sampling technique. To collect data in proper and convenient way, Convience sampling is used. The managers are easily accessible so it is most beneficial of all other sampling techniques. First of all the population was defined, and then sampling frame was determined. After determination of sampling frame, sampling technique was decided. Once the technique is decided, sample size was decided too. At last, the sampling process was executed. Sample Size The proposed number of respondents is two hundred and fifty (250). Instrument of Data Collection To study the effects of managerial characteristics and organizational culture on managers trade-off between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee production, a questionnaire is developed comprising of nine questions. First question is about the work practices of mangers and their individualistic approach towards the work and how they perceive and conceive it. This question is further divided in ten questions in order to become more specific. Second question, which is further subdivided into twenty questions, is about the organizational culture. The number of questions is higher as compare to previous one because culture is more descriptive and a lot of information is required to comprehend it. Third question is about gender. It will tell us that whether gender makes any difference in giving promotion either to an efficient or loyal employee. Question four is about the age. It will also help us to see whether attitudes and beliefs regarding loyalty and efficiency change with respect to age. Fifth and sixth questions are about employee experience with current organization and overall experience respectively. The seventh and eighth questions education and functional department is asked from respondents. It will enable us to comment whether perception of employee importance as education level and department change. Ninth and last question regarding name is optional because we are studying role of managers in promoting efficient or loyal employees impartially and irrespective of name, caste or color. In short the questionnaire was designed to collect about employees work practices, the culture of organization they work in and the managerial characteristics. Validity and Reliability test. The instrument used here is valid and reliable. Because it is specifically designed to collect data specifically required to study the effects of managerial characteristics and organizational culture on managers trade-off between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee promotion. To check the validity and reliability of instrument we did pilot testing and found the instrument valid and reliable in accordance with our study. Therefore data collected through this instrument is also valid and reliable and leads us to more useful and specific results. Research Model Developed Figure 3.1 Managerial Characteristic Organizational Sincerity Work Performance Organizational Culture Organizational management has to deal with different types of employees. Some are very hardworking and efficient while others are very loyal to the organizations. It is of great importance to an organization to understand the relationship between the organizational sincerity and work in order to grow, compete and even survive. Statistical Technique Correlation will be used for data analysis. We have used correlation because it is the statistical technique which enables us to understand and interpret the interdependence between organizational sincerity and work performance for employee performance. CHAPTER 4: RESULTS Table 4.1 Promotion criteria Managerial characteristics Organizational culture Organizational Sincerity Work Performance Age (Male) .055 (.404) -0.13 (.837) Age (Female) .226 (.418) -.170 (.546) Working Experience With Current Organization (Male) .058 (.376) .077 (.238) Working Experience With Current Organization (Female) .262 (.346) -.025 (.930) Overall Working Experience (Male) -0.19 (.768) .049 (.455) Overall Working Experience (Female) .269 (.333) -.239 (.390) Education Level (Male) -0.25 (.706) .117* (.073) Education Level (Female) .107 (.704) .314 (.254) Organizational Culture .395** (.000) .299** (.000) *, Correlation is significant at the 0.10 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). P value is written in parenthesis. All the Managerial characteristics except for Education Level of Male are insignificant as their P value > ÃŽÂ ±. A positive relation is shown between organizational culture, organizational sincerity, and work performance having P-value CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION, DISCUSSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH Conclusion Data analysis shows that there is no relation between managerial characteristics and organizational sincerity for both the genders, male and female. But in case of managerial characteristics and work performance, a relationship is established between managers education level and work performance but only for male gender. For female gender no such relationship exists. Analysis also shows that organizational culture is positively related to organizational sincerity and work performance. That suggest that stronger the organizational culture, better the wok performance and sincerity. Discussions, Implications and Future Research Organizational culture, sincerity and work performance are very important and crucial towards the achievement of organizational goals. Therefore work performance has been studied in relation to job satisfaction and consistent relations are established. But few attempts are made to find out the impact of organizational culture on achievement of organizational goals which is dependent upon work performance which leads to greater output and organizational sincerity. As we have found out a positive relationship between organizational culture and sincerity and between that of organizational culture and work performance. We can say that organizations in order to improve performance and build stronger relationship with their employees should work on building stronger and compatible organizational culture. It will not only improve employees productivity but employee turnover will also reduce which will save the training costs et cetera ultimately. Except of that competencies and skills which are developed in employees over a period of time can also be retained and even competitive advantage can be achieved on basis of it. Even though we have studied very important relationships among managerial characteristics, organizational culture, organizational sincerity and work performance, a lot needs to be done in this newly identified direction. In this unexplored direction and field of study researchers can study many variables like impact of organizational culture on conflict of interest and can enhance the understanding further. References Ali J Abbas and Kazemi Al- Ali (2005), The Kuwaiti Manager: Work Values and Orientations Journal of Business Ethics , 60: 63-73 DOI 10.1007A10551-005-2626-6 Armstrong, M. (2000), Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidances, Kogan Page, London. Avolio J. Bruce, Waldman A. David and McDaniel A. Michael (1990),Age and work performance in non-managerial jobs the effects of experience and occupational type, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No 2, 407-422. Bacon, D. (1989), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Businesss Role in War on Drugs, Nations Business, January, p.5. Baffour Gyan- George, (1999) The effects of employee participation and work design on firm performance: A managerial perspective, Management Research News, Vol. 22 Iss: 6, pp.1- 12 Baptiste Renee Nicole, (2008),Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and performance: a new dimension for HRM Volume: 46 Number: 2 pp: 284-309 Barney B. Jay (1986) , à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?,The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 3 , pp. 656-665 Becker E. Thomas, Billings S. Robert, Eveleth M. Daniel and Gilbert L. Nicole (1996),Foci and bases of employees commitment: implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No 2,464-482. Bijlsma, K. and Koopma, K. (2003), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Introduction: trust within organizations, Personnel Review, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 600-4. Blumberg, M., Pringle, C. C. (1982), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for the theory of work performance. Academy Of Management Review,7: 560-569. Boeker Warren (1997), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The Influence of Managerial Characteristics and Organizational Growth, the Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 152-170. Chatman A. Jennifer Jehn A. Karen (1994). Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: how different can you be?. Academy of management Journal 1995. Vol. 37, No. 3, 522-553 Chen Feng Yi and Tjosvold Dean, Participative Leadership by American and Chinese Managers in China: The Role of Relationships,Journal of Management Studies 43:8 December 2006 0022-2380 Denison r. Daniel Mishra K. Aneil (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization science. Vol. 6, No. 2, March-April 1995. Dirks, K. and Ferrin, D. (2002), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87 No. 4, pp. 611-28. Fassin Yves and Buelens Mark, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The hypocrisy-sincerity continuum in corporate communication and decision-making: a model of corporate social responsibility and business ethics practices, Ghent University, Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000 Gent And Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Reep 1, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Gershenfeld Cutcher(1988), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Industrial Relations and Economic Performance, Working Paper, School of Labor and Indus trial Relations, Michigan State University.. Gillespie, N. and Mann, L. (2004), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust, Journal of Managerial Psychology,Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 588-607. Glinow Ann Von Mary, Huo Paul Y., Lowe Kevin (1999),Leadership across the Pacific Ocean: a tri-national comparison,International Business Review, 8(1), 1-15. Gordan G. George DiTomaso (1992), Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture, Journal of Management Studies. Volume 29, Issue 6, pages 783-798. Gupta K. Anil and Govindarajan .V (1984), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1,pp. 25-41. Ilias Azleen, Rahman Abd Rahida, Abd Razak Zulkeflee Mohd (2008) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions, International business research, Vol. 1, No 3. Ilozer Dozie Ben, Love E.D Peter. Treloar Graham (2002), The Impact of Work Settings On Organizational Performance measures in built FacilitiesVolume 20, pp 61-68. Jaikumar, R, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Post industrial manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 64(6). 1986; pp.69-76. Jaunch R Lawrence, Glueck F William and Osborn N Richard (1978),Organizational loyalty, professional commitment, and academic research productivity, Academy of management Journal ,Vol. 2,No 1,84-92 Kim Soonhe (2002), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Participative management and job satisfaction: lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review. Martin J. Harry and Shore McFarlane Lynn (1989),Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in relation to work performance and turnover intentions. Human Relations, Volume 42 pp. 625-658 Mockaitis I. Audra (2005). A Cross-Cultural Study of Leadership Attitudes in Three Baltic Sea Region Countries. International Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol. 1 Iss. 1, 2005, pp. 44-63 Ovadje Franca Muogboh S. Obinna, (2009),Exploring the motivation to stay and to perform among managers in Nigeria, International Journal of Business Research. Paswan K. Audhesh, Pelton E. Lou and True L. Sheb (2005),Perceived managerial sincerity, feedback-seeking orientation and motivation among front-line employees of a service organization, Journal of Services Marketing Volume 19  · Number 1, 3-12. Ralston A. David, Holt H. David, Robert H. Terpstra and Cheng Kai Yu (2007). The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: a study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-19 Schein Edger H (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Slogan management Review. Vol 25, Issue: 2, Publisher: Samfundslitteratur, Pages: 3-16 Schein, Edgar H (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, Vol 45(2), Feb 1990, 109-119. Sheridan E. John (1992). Organizational culture and employee retention. Academy of management journal 1992. Vol. 35, No. 5, 1036-1056. Smith D. Alan and Rupp T. William (2002),Communication and loyalty among knowledge workers: a resource of the firm theory view, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 6,No. 3,pp250-261. Standing, G. (1997), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Globalisation, labour flexibility and insecurity: the era of market regulation, European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 3, pp. 7-37. Walters, M. (1995), Performance Management Handbook, Institute of Personnel and Development, London. Weick KE (1987), à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Organizational culture as a source of high-reliability, The California Management Review , volume 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 112-127.